MYSTERY: The Murders of Barry and Honey Sherman
Evaluation and Summary
This episode of Murder: True Crime Stories examines the high-profile deaths of Barry and Honey Sherman, prominent Canadian philanthropists and business figures found dead in their Toronto mansion's basement pool on December 15, 2017. Host Carter Roy focuses on the critical first six weeks of the investigation, during which the case's official narrative shifted dramatically. Initially, unnamed police sources told reporters the working theory was murder-suicide, a conclusion the Shermans' four adult children immediately rejected. The family hired their own legal representation and independent pathologist, commissioning second autopsies that contradicted the police findings—revealing marks on both victims' wrists and notably, no restraints found anywhere at the scene. This evidence prompted Toronto police to reverse their position six weeks later and officially reclassify the deaths as a targeted double homicide. The episode explores the family's decision to investigate their own city's police force and examines an unidentified figure captured on a neighbor's security camera walking a snowy sidewalk near the property. Roy contextualizes the case within the Shermans' prominence: Barry had built Apotex into one of the world's largest generic pharmaceutical companies, while Honey was among Canada's most prominent philanthropists. Nearly nine years after the deaths, the case remains unsolved with no arrests made, despite a reward that has climbed to $35 million and has never been claimed. The episode appears to focus on the investigative process, the family's role in challenging official narratives, and the lingering mysteries that define this high-profile unsolved case.
Verdict: A competent true crime episode covering a compelling unsolved case with solid narrative structure, but limited evidence of original reporting or exceptional storytelling depth.
True Crime rubric
-
Research depth 3/5 20%
Show notes indicate coverage of documented facts (autopsy findings, police reversal, timeline) but no mention of original reporting, new interviews, or exclusive records access.
-
Storytelling 3/5 20%
The episode structure (initial theory, family pushback, police reversal, lingering mystery) suggests narrative arc, but without hearing the audio, pacing and craft cannot be fully assessed.
-
Respect for victims 3/5 15%
Focus on investigative facts and family agency rather than sensationalism; no indication of exploitative framing, though depth of respectful treatment unclear from notes alone.
-
Substance 3/5 15%
48 minutes covering a complex case with multiple angles (police investigation, family counter-investigation, evidence discrepancies) suggests solid content, though show notes don't detail depth or padding.
-
Delivers on its title 4/5 15%
Title promises examination of the Sherman murders; episode delivers on this with focus on the first six weeks and investigation, though 'mystery' framing suggests unresolved case coverage rather than definitive account.
-
Value for time 3/5 15%
48 minutes for a complex unsolved case with multiple investigative angles is reasonable, though without audio assessment, pacing efficiency cannot be fully judged.
Worth it if you're interested in high-profile Canadian crime cases, investigative reversals, or unsolved mysteries where family intervention shaped the official narrative.
Content flags
- Ad-heavy Multiple sponsor reads and Crime House+ subscription pitches, plus cross-promotion of other shows, suggest significant ad load relative to 48-minute runtime.
Based on the episode description. AI-generated; it can be wrong.