We Need to Talk About Ethics Reform
Evaluation and Summary
This is the fifth and final episode in Strict Scrutiny's 'Hot Supreme Court Reform' series, focusing specifically on ethics reform for Supreme Court justices. Host Kate interviews Gabe Roth, executive director of Fix the Court, a nonpartisan organization advocating for judicial accountability. The episode explores what meaningful and enforceable ethics rules would look like for the justices, addressing critical gaps in current oversight. Key topics include the absence of an Inspector General for the judiciary, the lack of clear rules governing recusal decisions, and what structural reforms could improve accountability without partisan bias. Roth makes the case for specific nonpartisan reforms, though the show notes don't detail which reforms are prioritized. The episode appears to be part of a broader series examining various Supreme Court reform proposals, with this installment narrowing focus to the ethics dimension—an increasingly salient issue given recent controversies around justice conduct and financial disclosures. The conversation seems designed to move beyond partisan rhetoric and ground reform proposals in practical, enforceable mechanisms. The episode includes typical Strict Scrutiny elements: a survey for listeners, merchandise promotion, information about CLE credits available in multiple states, and promotion of a live event in Washington, DC. The hosts' books are also promoted.
Why this score: A substantive, timely exploration of a critical governance gap with a credible expert guest, though the show notes provide limited detail on specific reform proposals discussed.
Worth it if you're interested in Supreme Court accountability, judicial ethics, or structural reforms that transcend partisan divides.
Based on the episode description. AI-generated; it can be wrong.
Show notes
More from Strict Scrutiny
Strict Scrutiny opens its coverage of the new Supreme Court term with three main segments. First, the hosts (Leah, Kate, and Melissa) analyze the Court's decision allowing the administration to continue "third-country removals"—a deportation policy where the U.S. removes immigrants to countries other than their…
Worth it if you follow Supreme Court developments, care about immigration policy, or want expert-guided analysis of the new term's major cases.
Strict Scrutiny returns for a new Supreme Court term with hosts Leah Litman, Kate Shaw, and Melissa Murray breaking down the major cases and legal battles ahead. The episode covers several high-profile dockets: Second Amendment challenges to AR-15 and semi-automatic rifle regulations, religious exemptions for schools…
Worth it if you follow Supreme Court dockets, care about constitutional law impacts on press freedom and civil rights, or want expert legal analysis of the Trump administration's litigation strategy.
Strict Scrutiny's fourth episode in their 'Hot Supreme Court Reform September' series focuses on jurisdiction stripping—a proposed reform to limit the Supreme Court's power over federal administrative law. Host Leah Farrell interviews two Columbia Law School experts: former FTC Chair Lina Khan and Lev Menand. Menand…
Worth it if you're interested in Supreme Court reform, administrative law, or how structural changes to federal jurisdiction could reshape regulatory power.
Strict Scrutiny's episode 'Trump's Assault on the Free Press' covers multiple legal and political developments from the Trump administration in September 2026. The hosts Melissa and Leah address the President's ban on certain media outlets from accessing the White House, framed as an attack on press freedom. They also…
Worth it if you're already a Strict Scrutiny fan seeking commentary on Trump administration legal challenges and want to hear Alex Wagner discuss her book on judicial influence.
This episode is the third installment in Strict Scrutiny's 'Hot Supreme Court Reform September' series, featuring host Leah Litman in conversation with Daphna Renan and Nikolas Bowie, co-authors of 'Supremacy: How Rule by the Court Replaced Government by the People.' The discussion centers on judicial supremacy—the…
Worth it if you're interested in Supreme Court reform, constitutional law, or arguments about how judicial power should be constrained within the federal system.
Strict Scrutiny's hosts Kate, Leah, and Melissa discuss a Supreme Court decision blocking a Trump administration regulation that would have imposed new restrictions on mail-in ballot delivery through the Postal Service. The regulation would have required states to adopt last-minute, burdensome, and allegedly…
Worth it if you follow Supreme Court voting rights cases closely and want the hosts' sharp legal commentary, but not if you're seeking balanced analysis of the decision's merits.