Deborah Lebree's podcast ·Oct 6, 2026 ·30 min

Call My A.I. Agent

Evaluation and Summary

6.1/10

This episode from Deborah Lebree's podcast (which appears to be The Daily from The New York Times) explores the rapid adoption of AI agents—a new category of artificial intelligence applications that can perform everyday tasks like sending emails and booking travel. The episode centers on Eli Tan, a technology reporter for The New York Times, who conducted a personal experiment by opening his life to Muse, Meta's newly released AI agent. Tan reportedly was "blown away" by the experience after using Muse to perform dozens of day-to-day tasks. The episode examines both the appeal and the potential risks of these AI agents, particularly the tension between their usefulness and their requirement for access to sensitive personal information. The framing suggests the episode takes a balanced approach to the trend—acknowledging the genuine utility and appeal of these tools (describing them as "useful" and "kind of cute") while raising legitimate privacy and security concerns about the data these agents need to function effectively. The episode appears designed to help listeners understand what AI agents are, why millions are adopting them, and what trade-offs they're making in doing so. With a 30-minute runtime and a single expert guest, the episode likely combines Tan's firsthand account of using Muse with broader context about the AI agent trend and its implications.

Verdict: A timely, well-sourced episode on a genuinely important trend with a credible expert, but limited show notes prevent confirmation of depth, balance, or whether it goes beyond surface-level exploration.

News rubric

Accuracy and sourcing 3/5 20%

Guest is a credible NYT technology reporter with direct experience; Muse is a real Meta product; claims are grounded in firsthand reporting but show notes don't detail specific sources or data beyond Tan's personal experience.
Balance and context 3/5 20%

Title and framing acknowledge both appeal (useful, cute) and concern (sensitive data requirement), suggesting balanced treatment, but show notes don't confirm competing perspectives or expert counterarguments are included.
Timeliness and relevance 5/5 15%

Published October 2026 during a documented surge in AI agent adoption; directly addresses a current technology trend affecting millions of users.
Substance 3/5 15%

Firsthand reporting from a credible journalist provides real content, but 30 minutes with one guest and limited show notes suggest moderate depth; likely some padding or conversational filler in a short format.
Delivers on its title 4/5 15%

Title "Call My A.I. Agent" is somewhat playful but the episode clearly delivers on exploring what AI agents are and what happens when someone uses one; minor ambiguity in the title's exact meaning.
Value for time 3/5 15%

30 minutes is reasonable for an explainer with one guest interview; likely well-paced but show notes don't confirm whether the length is optimal or includes unnecessary tangents.

How we score News

Worth it if you're curious about AI agents, want a reporter's firsthand account of using Meta's Muse, or need a quick primer on why millions are adopting these tools and what privacy trade-offs they involve.

#ai #technology #privacy #meta #artificial intelligence #consumer tech

Based on the episode description. AI-generated; it can be wrong.

Show notes

Over the past few weeks, millions of people have rushed to download a new type of artificial intelligence app — agents. They are useful, kind of cute and need your most sensitive personal information to work.Eli Tan, a reporter who covers technology for The New York Times, opened up his life to Muse, Meta’s A.I. agent. He explained what happened next.Guest: Eli Tan , a reporter covering the technology industry for The New York Times.Background reading: Muse, Meta’s new A.I. agent , can send your emails and book your travel. Eli Tan said he “was blown away” by Muse after using it to perform dozens of day-to-day tasks. Photo: Gabriela Bhaskar/The New York Times For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily . Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Amazon Music. You can also subscribe via your favorite podcast app here https://www.nytimes.com/activate-access/audio?source=podcatcher . For more podcasts and narrated articles, download The New York Times app at nytimes.com/app. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

Episode page

More from Deborah Lebree's podcast

Deborah Lebree's podcast ·1w ago ·33 min

A Failed Execution and the Future of the Death Penalty

This episode examines a recent botched execution in Tennessee where Christa Pike survived two doses of lethal injection drugs, using this incident as a lens to explore broader trends in American capital punishment. Guest Pamela Colloff, an investigative reporter at ProPublica and staff writer for The New York Times…

Worth it if you follow capital punishment policy, want context on recent execution failures, or are interested in how public opinion and state policy diverge on contentious issues.

Sensitive

Deborah Lebree's podcast ·1w ago ·25 min

Three Vans, a Startled Farmer and an Iranian Plot Against the U.S.

This 25-minute episode from Deborah Lebree's podcast features Eric Schmitt, a national security correspondent for The New York Times, discussing a mysterious incident near a U.S. Air Force base in Britain. The episode centers on three key events: the discovery of three vans near the base, a startled farmer's report…

Worth it if you follow national security news and want a quick, authoritative briefing on a significant U.S.-UK military incident from a Times correspondent.