← The Find Out Podcast
The Find Out Podcast ·Oct 6, 2026 ·1h 11m

You Say You Support Women. How Do You Treat Them?

Evaluation and Summary

3.1/10

The Find Out Podcast hosts Rich, Luke, and Tim welcome comedian Lisandra Vazquez for a wide-ranging discussion that nominally centers on the gap between performative allyship toward women and genuine accountability. The episode opens with substantive ground: they revisit the Cornell Seven case, examine how "what did she expect?" rhetoric enables perpetrators, and discuss consent and victim-blaming culture. Vazquez appears to bring a comedian's perspective to these serious topics. However, the episode pivots significantly into electoral politics and celebrity commentary. The hosts explore Vazquez's disillusionment after attending the Power to the People concert, where Tom Morello revealed he didn't vote for Kamala Harris. This triggers a broader conversation about political purity tests, the backlash Vazquez faced for meeting Hillary Clinton, and the costs when voters reject candidates as insufficiently progressive. The discussion touches on who bears the price of such political stands. The episode then shifts into lighter, comedic territory: Vazquez's collection of Karoline Leavitt crosses (apparently a running joke), the prosthetics involved in her Trump impression, and Vivek Ramaswamy's "losing battle" with picking up a child—likely referring to a viral moment or comedy bit. The episode concludes with promotion of a live election-night event in NYC on November 3rd, available both in-person and online via wearefindout.com/tour. The title promises an examination of the disconnect between claiming to support women and actually treating them well. The show notes suggest this will be the primary focus, but the actual content appears to spend significant time on electoral politics, celebrity reactions, and comedy impressions. While the opening section on consent and victim-blaming seems substantive, the pivot to political purity tests and lighter comedy material suggests the episode may not fully deliver on its title's promise. The material provided doesn't indicate how much time is devoted to each segment, making it difficult to assess whether the women-focused content dominates or is overshadowed by political and comedic tangents. The episode appears to blend serious social commentary with entertainment and promotion, which may dilute focus on the core topic.

Verdict: The episode opens with legitimate social commentary on allyship and accountability but appears to dilute its focus with political tangents and comedy material, making it a mixed bag that partially delivers on its title.

Government rubric

  • Accuracy and sourcing n/a

    Show notes reference specific events (Cornell Seven case, Power to the People concert, Tom Morello's voting choice) but provide no sourcing details or verification; cannot assess accuracy from notes alone

  • Balance and context 3/5 25%

    Discussion of victim-blaming and consent suggests critical examination, but political section on purity tests indicates some attempt at nuance; however, limited detail on how competing perspectives are actually presented

  • Clarity on what it means 2/5 19%

    Title suggests policy/cultural analysis of allyship, but notes focus on anecdotes (Morello, Hillary meeting, impressions) rather than explaining real-world consequences of performative support

  • Substance 2/5 19%

    Opens with substantive topics (consent, victim-blaming) but appears to dilute focus with comedy impressions, celebrity gossip, and political tangents; significant padding with lighter material

  • Delivers on its title 2/5 19%

    Title promises focused examination of allyship gap; notes indicate substantial pivot to electoral politics, celebrity reactions, and comedy bits, suggesting the episode drifts from its stated premise

  • Value for time 2/5 19%

    71-minute runtime covering serious topics, political debate, comedy impressions, and promotion suggests potential for padding; unclear if content justifies length

How we score Government

Worth it if you enjoy The Find Out's blend of social commentary and comedy, or are interested in post-election political discussion, but less so if you want focused analysis of gender and allyship.

Content flags

  • Ad-heavy Episode includes ad choice disclosure and promotion of live tour tickets, suggesting commercial integration

Based on the episode description. AI-generated; it can be wrong.

Show notes

Comedian Lisandra Vazquez joins Rich, Luke, and Tim to talk about the gap between calling yourself an ally and actually showing up for women. They revisit the Cornell Seven case, dig into why “what did she expect?” lets men off the hook, and talk about consent, victim blaming, and why threatening to beat up predators doesn't replace doing the work in your own life. Then, Lisandra relives going from feeling hopeful at the Power to the People concert to hearing Tom Morello say he didn't vote for Kamala. The conversation turns to political purity tests, getting backlash for meeting Hillary Clinton, and who pays the price when people decide no candidate is good enough. Also: Lisandra's growing collection of Karoline Leavitt crosses, the prosthetics behind her Trump impression, and Vivek Ramaswamy's losing battle with picking up a child. Election night is live in NYC on November 3rd, or watch for free online! Tickets at wearefindout.com/tour . Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
/10