Bill Kristol: They're F*cking Thieves
Evaluation and Summary
Bill Kristol and Democratic strategist Patrick Gaspard join Tim Miller for a 57-minute episode centered on alleged illegality and misconduct by the Trump administration. The title's inflammatory language frames the episode's core complaint: that the Trump administration misused taxpayer funds to run campaign ads during NFL games and violated congressional funding appropriations laws, with hosts suggesting the administration is brazenly flouting the law. The episode opens with this accusation as its primary focus. Beyond the headline grievance, the episode covers several secondary topics. Tim shares highlights from The Bulwark's largest live event in Dayton, Ohio, where the community donated significantly to support Haitian immigrants in Springfield—a cause the outlet is actively fundraising for. Patrick Gaspard is interviewed about Democratic strategy, though specifics aren't detailed in the notes. The hosts launch a new segment featuring 'longshot picks' for midterm candidates they want to back: Bill endorses Todd Achilles in Idaho, while Tim backs Jessica Killin in Colorado. They also discuss Victor Marx, a gubernatorial candidate in Colorado. References to Ohio's Don Leonard for Congress suggest additional candidate coverage. Other topics mentioned include Trump's handling of AI policy (described as "unbelievably irresponsible"), media coverage gaps around an Iranian green card-holding family detained at Dilley detention center, and a closing reflection on the Parable of the Good Samaritan—seemingly tying back to the Springfield immigration theme. The episode blends hard-news accusations (alleged legal violations), political strategy discussion, candidate endorsements, and moral/religious commentary. Show notes reference Bill's earlier segment on Cardinal Robert McElroy and Jim's newsletters on Springfield, suggesting layered coverage of immigration issues. The structure appears to be a mix of monologue, guest interviews, and discussion segments, with a closing song by MJ Lenderman. The episode seems designed for an audience already aligned with The Bulwark's center-right, anti-Trump editorial stance, combining investigative framing with activism (fundraising for Haitian immigrants) and electoral engagement (candidate endorsements).
Verdict: A politically partisan episode making serious legal accusations without visible sourcing or counterargument, wrapped in activism and candidate endorsements—useful for aligned listeners but lacking the rigor expected of news content.
News rubric
-
Accuracy and sourcing 2/5 20%
Show notes reference specific allegations (NFL ad spending, appropriations violations) but provide no links to sources, investigations, or documentation; claims are asserted without visible sourcing.
-
Balance and context 1/5 20%
Episode frames Trump administration as lawbreakers with no indication of presenting counterarguments, administration response, or legal analysis of disputed claims.
-
Timeliness and relevance 3/5 15%
Topics (Trump administration conduct, midterm elections, Springfield immigration) are current and relevant, though the specific allegations' newsworthiness isn't established in notes.
-
Substance 3/5 15%
Episode covers multiple topics (legal allegations, candidate endorsements, immigration, AI policy) but show notes provide limited detail on depth of discussion or evidence presented for any claim.
-
Delivers on its title 4/5 15%
Title's accusation of theft appears to be the episode's opening focus, though show notes reveal the episode branches into candidate endorsements, immigration activism, and other topics beyond the headline claim.
-
Value for time 2/5 15%
57 minutes covering legal allegations, candidate picks, immigration, AI, and religious reflection suggests scattered focus; unclear if depth justifies length without hearing the actual episode.
Worth it if you're already a Bulwark reader seeking reinforcement of anti-Trump views and want to learn about endorsed midterm candidates and Springfield immigration fundraising.
Content flags
- Clickbait Title uses inflammatory language ('F*cking Thieves') and makes a serious legal accusation, but show notes reveal the episode covers multiple disparate topics including candidate endorsements and immigration activism, not a focused investigation of the alleged theft.
Based on the episode description. AI-generated; it can be wrong.
Show notes
More from The Bulwark Daily
Susan Glasser, a veteran political journalist, joins Tim Miller to dissect Trump's political strategy and recent controversies. The episode opens with Trump's pivot to anti-Muslim rhetoric as a way to consolidate white male voters—described as reviving one of his "old favorites" from the birther conspiracy era.…
Worth it if you're a Bulwark subscriber or anti-Trump partisan seeking reinforcement of critical perspectives on Trump's political tactics and corruption allegations.
Tim Miller interviews Angie Nixon, Florida's Democratic Senate nominee, in this 56-minute episode focused on her campaign message and political positioning. Nixon frames the central issue as average Americans living in the dreams of oligarchs rather than their own, positioning her campaign around helping all…
Worth it if you're a progressive voter interested in Nixon's Senate campaign or a Bulwark listener who appreciates Democratic-leaning political commentary.
Michael Lewis joins Tim Miller to discuss his new book 'Blockers: Rebels in the Deep State,' which examines government employees who have either survived or been pushed out during Trump's DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) initiative. Lewis argues that despite Trump's strategy of destroying trust in government…
Worth it if you're interested in Michael Lewis's perspective on government dysfunction and want an optimistic counternarrative to anti-government sentiment, or if you follow The Bulwark's political analysis.
Bill Kristol joins Tim Miller for this October 2026 episode of The Bulwark Daily, which frames Trump's political strategy around scapegoating and blame-shifting. The hosts argue that despite Trump's rhetorical focus on enemies, his administration faces mounting crises on his watch: a war-related global food crisis,…
Worth it if you're a committed Bulwark listener who shares the outlet's center-right anti-Trump perspective and want Bill Kristol's take on current political strategy and candidate alternatives.
Tim Miller hosts Tommy Vietor for a wide-ranging political commentary episode covering multiple Trump administration controversies and policy concerns. The episode opens with speculation about Trump's physical health, including observations about his gait and apparent use of a brace, framed through viral video clips.…
Worth it if you're a committed Bulwark listener who enjoys Tim Miller's commentary style and want a quick rundown of anti-Trump talking points, but not if you seek balanced analysis or substantive investigation.
The Bulwark Daily episode features hosts Tim Miller, Josh Barro, and Jonathan V. Last discussing economic frustrations under the Trump administration and governance concerns. The episode opens with a lighter note about accountability in Washington, referencing a staff member's career troubles following a basketball…
Worth it if you're a politically engaged listener interested in center-right critiques of the Trump administration's economic policy and governance style.